
Alan Cumming
A Scottish performer who bends gender and genre with a mischievous glint, making the stage and screen a more thrilling and inclusive space.
On January 27, 2010, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPad, a device that would redefine personal computing not by solving a problem, but by creating a new category of desire.
Most people remember the iPad as a tablet. That is the first assumption to discard. When Steve Jobs walked onto the stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, he framed the device not as a missing piece, but as a third category. It was meant to sit, nebulously, between the smartphone and the laptop. The public and the press were skeptical. The term ‘magical’ was used, a word that often masks a lack of clear utility.
What was overlooked was the ambition of the gesture itself. This was not an invention born of necessity, like a faster processor or a larger hard drive. It was an act of cultural prophecy. Apple was not answering a question everyone was asking; it was insisting we had been asking the wrong ones. The success of the iPad would prove that a market could be conjured from sheer intuition about human behavior—about how we might prefer to read, watch, and touch our media. The technical specifications were secondary to the proposition: a sheet of glass as a portal. The real innovation was the audacity to believe that between the things we knew we needed, there was room for something we had never considered wanting.
Over 16,000 Yemenis gather in Sana'a's Al-Tahrir Square, their chants and collective breath marking the first major protest of the Yemeni Revolution, a physical demand for change in the cold January air.
The air in Sana’a is thin and cold in January, carrying the scent of dust and diesel. By mid-morning on the 27th, the sound is not of traffic but of feet—thousands of them, a low, shuffling thunder on the asphalt. They pour into Al-Tahrir Square, a wide, open basin in the heart of the city. The banners they carry are not yet the tattered standards of a long war; they are crisp, hand-painted sheets declaring ‘Irhal’—Leave.
You feel the crowd’s density as a pressure change. The heat of bodies cuts the mountain chill. Chants rise in waves, not from a single loudspeaker but from a hundred different points, coalescing into a rhythmic roar that echoes off the stone government buildings. The smell of roasted peanuts from a vendor clashes with the acrid tang of anticipation. Young men link arms, not as soldiers, but as students and shopkeepers. Their breath fogs in the air. You see a man adjusting his *jambiya*, the traditional dagger, ensuring it is secure before he raises his hands to clap. This is the beginning. It is not a coordinated strike or a televised address. It is the physical occupation of space, the sound of a nation exhaling a breath held for thirty-three years, warm and visible in the winter air.
The Library of Congress announced the inaugural selections for the National Recording Registry, a formal act of preservation that quietly defined the sound of American memory.
On January 27, 2003, the Librarian of Congress, James H. Billington, released a list. It contained twenty-five titles. The announcement was procedural, a fulfillment of the National Recording Preservation Act of 2000. The language was administrative. The selections were not ranked.
The list included the 1909 recording of ‘Listen to the Lambs’ by the Fisk Jubilee Singers. It included ‘Rhapsody in Blue’ by George Gershwin, and ‘Sweet Lorraine’ by Art Tatum. It included John F. Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural address and the 1977 album ‘Never Mind the Bollocks, Here’s the Sex Pistols.’ The criteria were explicit: recordings must be culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant, and at least ten years old.
The act of selection is an act of exclusion. The registry did not claim to contain the ‘best’ of American sound. It claimed to contain the essential. The juxtapositions were deliberate. The aria from *Wozzeck* sat alongside ‘The Sounds of Earth’ from the Voyager Golden Record. This was not a celebration. It was a taxonomy. The registry established a canon by flat, creating an official narrative of the American ear. The power of the list lay in its cold authority. It said, simply, these sounds shall not be lost. All other sounds were placed, by implication, in a different category.
The public release of police footage showing the beating of Tyre Nichols transformed a local tragedy into a national reckoning, forcing a confrontation with the mechanics of violence.
The video did not show a mystery. It showed a sequence. A traffic stop. A conversation. A man running. Then the convergence of bodies in a residential street, under the stark glow of streetlights. The release of the footage by the Memphis Police Department on January 27, 2023, was an administrative act that became a social catalyst. The outrage was not born of ignorance, but of witness.
This event sits at a specific intersection in the long struggle for accountability. It was not about the absence of evidence, but its overwhelming, graphic presence. The technology of documentation—the body camera, the surveillance pole—turned against the institution it was meant to serve. The public was made complicit in the viewing, forced to adjudicate what the legal system had yet to process. The protests that ignited were not just calls for justice for one man, but manifestations of a profound fatigue with a cycle: incident, footage, outrage, inertia. The videos made the abstract concrete. They presented not a ‘bad apple’ theory, but a protocol of force, a choreography of violence performed by multiple actors. The question shifted from ‘What happened?’ to ‘What does this repeated happening say about the structure designed to prevent it?’ The footage provided answers that were far more difficult than the questions.
Beneath the Tsugaru Strait, a pilot tunnel from Honshu met its counterpart from Hokkaido, completing the first dry connection between Japan's main islands through the world's longest undersea passage.
Imagine the pressure. Not of water, though 140 meters of it weighed down on the rock above. The pressure of expectation, of precision. For over a decade, crews had bored from the south and from the north, through volcanic rock and fault lines, guided by lasers and hope. The Seikan Tunnel was an argument against geography, a refusal of the ferocious strait that had swallowed thousands of lives in shipwrecks.
On January 27, 1983, the argument was won in darkness. In the pilot shaft, a smaller tunnel running ahead of the main bore, the final meter of rock gave way. A drill bit broke through to empty space, and then to the light of the opposing team’s lamp. The error in alignment was less than 15 centimeters over 53.85 kilometers. The air, which had been still and stale, suddenly moved with a new current. It was not a dramatic explosion or a public ceremony. It was a technical milestone, achieved in a cramped, damp tube deep below the sea floor. The engineers shook hands in that subterranean chamber, their celebration muffled by rock. They had connected two landmasses without seeing the sky. The main rail tunnels would follow, but this was the moment of proof: a thread had been passed through the needle of the earth, and the two ends were now, incontrovertibly, one.